Friday, 6 February 2015

Phil Clarke Executive Report Jan 2015


 Education and Equalities

Discussion and general agreement was reached on final changes to motions for TUC conferences. The LGBT motion included important campaigning points on LGBT Equality being included in Initial Teacher training and for the disabled workers’ conference a motion on the damaged done by one size fits all test based curriculum.

Compass report
This report that the NUT has helped finance in a significant way has after an completely unacceptable first draft been heavily re-written. However it is still to far from NUT policy to be supported, not being anti-privatisation as well as distant from NUT positions on school inspections international tests and adult education. One more attempt is going to be made to make changes so we can endorse it but it may well end up not being join badge-able and the NUT will have to make clear its differences at any launch events.

Carter review into ITT
We heard that this did not recommend downgrading of PGCE as Tories wanted however many recommendations are worrying and the idea of a core curriculum for all ITT to deliver was central.
Most concerning is the clear bias towards school direct / academies ITT against university provision and the fact that the report did not address the growing teacher supply problem with significant percentages of recruitment falling short.

Prevent

The committee discussed the issues around ‘Prevent’ and role schools are now expected to play in counterterrorist monitoring.
Concern was shared by all on this particularly on the idea of ‘British Values’ which is suggested we the positive values highlighted are somehow uniquely British and the difficulties teachers have reported this sort of expectation is causing when trying to discuss complex issues such as terrorism and imperialism.  Certainly it was not felt appropriate that OFSTED should be making judgments on a schools ability to monitor students as has already happened in East London.

College of Teaching Proposal Briefing
A briefing was held plans for a college of teaching. These moving forward but on a worrying basis.
The outline seems to be ill thought through with a voluntary organization asking teachers to volunteer to have more observations to receive master teacher status with dubious value. I was concerned that the meeting was not hard enough on the plans and this concern is reinforced by the press release that was far too uncritical of the scheme.  

Organising and Membership
Main discussion centered around the accountability of organisers and how they can and should work alongside division officers. This is a not unexpected teething problem in my opinion and one where the union can meet the correct balance of maintaining the democratic accountability of the division while maximizing the effect of the organisers.

Full Executive
The executive heard a report that updated us on our Stand Up for Education campaign. Clearly some impressive work is being done with the manifesto, lobbying and questions times.

However on the central demands we took to the government we had not been given any clear concessions. With this in mind it was concerning to see no plans for further industrial action in the report despite this being agreed previously and endorsed by 80% of the respondents in our survey

I seconded an objection that sought to simply reintroduce the working unanimously agreed in October that if sufficient progress was not made the officers should draw up plans for up to two days strike action. Disappointingly this was defeated 24 – 12 and leaves me concerned that we will not follow through on the steer given by members.


This fear is all the greater given the announcements since the executive by Nicky Morgan which have offer nothing concrete to reduce teacher workload.  

No comments:

Post a Comment